Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951)

Jennings v. Illinois


No. 95


Argued November 5-6, 1951
Decided December 3, 1951 *
342 U.S. 104

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS

Syllabus

Under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act, petitioner, a prisoner in an Illinois penitentiary, filed in the state court in which he had been convicted a petition alleging facts sufficient to establish a prima facie violation of his rights under the Federal Constitution through the admission of a coerced confession in evidence at his trial. The State’s Attorney did not deny these allegations, but moved to dismiss the petition on grounds of res judicata and failure to state a cause of action. The court dismissed the petition without a hearing or otherwise determining the factual issues presented. The State Supreme Court, without argument and without opinion, dismissed a writ of error by a form order reciting that it had examined and reviewed the petition and record in the post-conviction hearing and found the same to disclose no violation or denial of petitioner’s constitutional rights.

Held: judgment vacated and cause remanded for further proceedings. Pp. 105-112.

1. If his allegations are true, and if his claim has not been waived at or after trial, petitioner is held in custody in violation of federal constitutional rights, and he is entitled to his day in court for resolution of these issues. Pp. 110-111.

2. On remand, petitioner should be advised whether his claim that his constitutional rights were infringed at his trial may be determined under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, or whether that Act does not provide an appropriate state remedy in this case. P. 111.

3. If petitioner’s claim may be resolved in a proceeding under that Act, either by an inquiry into the verity of his factual allegations or a finding that his federal rights were waived during or after his trial, such resolution may proceed without further action by this Court. Pp. 111-112.

4. If Illinois does not provide an appropriate remedy for such a determination, petitioner may proceed without more to apply to the United States District Court for a writ of habeas corpus. P. 112.

Judgments vacated and causes remanded.

Illinois trial courts dismissed petitioners’ petitions under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act, Ill.Rev.Stat., 1951, c. 38, §§ 826-832. The Illinois Supreme Court dismissed writs of error. This Court granted certiorari. 341 U.S. 947; 342 U.S. 811. Judgments vacated and causes remanded, p. 112.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951) in 342 U.S. 104 342 U.S. 105. Original Sources, accessed June 2, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3K5HAD6CLQCXPGZ.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951), in 342 U.S. 104, page 342 U.S. 105. Original Sources. 2 Jun. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3K5HAD6CLQCXPGZ.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (1951). cited in 1951, 342 U.S. 104, pp.342 U.S. 105. Original Sources, retrieved 2 June 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3K5HAD6CLQCXPGZ.