|
|
United States v. Idaho Dept. Of Water Resources, 508 U.S. 1 (1993)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Idaho Dept. Of Water Resources, 508 U.S. 1 (1993)
JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring in the judgment.
As the Court points out, ante at 8, before 1985, "fees" comparable to those at issue in this litigation were taxed as "costs" in Idaho. Because I am persuaded that these exactions are precisely what Congress had in mind when it excepted judgments for "costs" from its broad waiver of sovereign immunity from participation in water rights adjudications, I concur in the Court’s judgment.
Contents:
Chicago:
John Paul Stevens, "Stevens, J., Concurring," United States v. Idaho Dept. Of Water Resources, 508 U.S. 1 (1993) in 508 U.S. 1 Original Sources, accessed July 5, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=117FL88SQVMCZMG.
MLA:
Stevens, John Paul. "Stevens, J., Concurring." United States v. Idaho Dept. Of Water Resources, 508 U.S. 1 (1993), in 508 U.S. 1, Original Sources. 5 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=117FL88SQVMCZMG.
Harvard:
Stevens, JP, 'Stevens, J., Concurring' in United States v. Idaho Dept. Of Water Resources, 508 U.S. 1 (1993). cited in 1993, 508 U.S. 1. Original Sources, retrieved 5 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=117FL88SQVMCZMG.
|