|
|
Carmichael v. Eberle, 177 U.S. 63 (1900)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Carmichael v. Eberle, 177 U.S. 63 (1900)
Carmichael v. Eberle No. 168 Submitted March 5, 1900 Decided March 26, 1900 177 U.S. 63
ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME
COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO
Syllabus
In the light of the various orders of the court below, this Court holds that a rehearing was not granted in this case, but that the motion for rehearing was permitted to be argued, and as that was heard before four of the judges of the court, and there was an equal division, it was denied; and, as the judgment of reversal was not a final judgment, the appeal must be dismissed.
The statement of the case is in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Carmichael v. Eberle, 177 U.S. 63 (1900) in 177 U.S. 63 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1VPV2X221IKVK5N.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Carmichael v. Eberle, 177 U.S. 63 (1900), in 177 U.S. 63, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1VPV2X221IKVK5N.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Carmichael v. Eberle, 177 U.S. 63 (1900). cited in 1900, 177 U.S. 63. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1VPV2X221IKVK5N.
|