|
|
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915)
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Company No. 253 Argued May 3, 1915 Decided May 17, 1915 237 U.S. 479
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OT THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Syllabus
Where it appear from the plaintiff’s statement that his case is for infringement and arose under the patent laws, the district court has jurisdiction notwithstanding the fact that he may also rely upon a contract as furnishing the mode in which the damages grounded on infringement should be ascertained.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the district court in a case involving infringement of patent, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915) in 237 U.S. 479 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=25QTIEPR8XURXS1.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915), in 237 U.S. 479, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=25QTIEPR8XURXS1.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915). cited in 1915, 237 U.S. 479. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=25QTIEPR8XURXS1.
|