|
|
Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914)
Taylor v. Anderson No. 338 Submitted April 30, 1914 Decided May 25, 1914 234 U.S. 74
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
Whether a case begun in a district court is one arising under the Constitution or a law or treaty of the United States in the sense of the jurisdictional statute (Judicial Code § 24) must be determined from what necessarily appears in the plaintiff’s statement of his own claim in the declaration unaided by anything alleged in anticipation or avoidance of defenses which may be interposed by defendant.
197 F. 383 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the district court of the United States under § 24, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914) in 234 U.S. 74 Original Sources, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=297BIUF4B3W6NBL.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914), in 234 U.S. 74, Original Sources. 30 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=297BIUF4B3W6NBL.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914). cited in 1914, 234 U.S. 74. Original Sources, retrieved 30 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=297BIUF4B3W6NBL.
|