|
|
United States v. American Livestock Commission Co., 279 U.S. 435 (1929)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. American Livestock Commission Co., 279 U.S. 435 (1929)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 279 U.S. 429, click here.
United States v. American Livestock Commission Company No. 513 Argued March 5, 1929 Decided May 20, 1929 279 U.S. 435
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
1. A boycott of one by others of the dealers or market agencies on a livestock exchange may be an unfair practice within the meaning of the Packers & Stockyards Act. P. 436.
2. Though part of the dealings of a duly registered cooperative market agency may have been ultra vires, the maintenance of a general boycott against it on this account by other associations is not justified, and, under the Packers and Stockyards Act, the Secretary of Agriculture has authority to order the discontinuance of the discriminatory practice, to the extent, at least, that it applied to the legitimate business of the complainant. P. 437.
3. A cooperative association organized under the state laws and found by the Secretary of Agriculture to be duly registered as a market agency under the Packers & Stockyards Act is within the protection of that Act notwithstanding that its powers are limited to the handling of the livestock of it members. P. 438.
28 F.2d 63 reversed.
Appeal by the United States from a decree of a district court of three judges which granted an injunction restraining the enforcement of an order of the Secretary of Agriculture requiring the discontinuance by respondents of a boycott of the Producers Commission Association at the Oklahoma National Stockyards.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. American Livestock Commission Co., 279 U.S. 435 (1929) in 279 U.S. 435 279 U.S. 436. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3A73VFT1Z4D3NKI.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. American Livestock Commission Co., 279 U.S. 435 (1929), in 279 U.S. 435, page 279 U.S. 436. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3A73VFT1Z4D3NKI.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. American Livestock Commission Co., 279 U.S. 435 (1929). cited in 1929, 279 U.S. 435, pp.279 U.S. 436. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3A73VFT1Z4D3NKI.
|