|
|
Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 265 U.S. 242, click here.
Hixon v. Oakes No. 420 Argued April 24, 1924 Decided May 26, 1924 265 U.S. 254
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
A city ordinance forbidding the filling of prescriptions calling for more than eight ounces of alcoholic liquor manifestly does not infringe any right of the pharmacist granted by the Eighteenth Amendment or the National Prohibition Act and protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Writ of error to review, 61 Cal.App. 200, dismissed.
Error to a judgment of the District Court of Appeal of California, remanding the plaintiff in error in a habeas corpus proceeding.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924) in 265 U.S. 254 265 U.S. 255. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3JRPGCDY5L6HB8R.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924), in 265 U.S. 254, page 265 U.S. 255. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3JRPGCDY5L6HB8R.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hixon v. Oakes, 265 U.S. 254 (1924). cited in 1924, 265 U.S. 254, pp.265 U.S. 255. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3JRPGCDY5L6HB8R.
|