Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952)

Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.


No. 40


Argued October 23-24, 1952
Decided November 17, 1952
344 U.S. 48

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Syllabus

At the close of the evidence in a suit in a federal district court under the Jones Act for wrongful death, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint and for a directed verdict in its favor. The court reserved decision on the motion and submitted the case to the jury. A verdict was returned for plaintiff, and judgment was entered thereon. Within ten days after reception of the verdict, defendant moved to have it set aside, but did not move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict and denied the pre-verdict motions for dismissal and for a directed verdict. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, and reversed the judgment of the district court.

Held: Under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court of Appeals could not direct entry of a judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict. Pp. 49-54.

(a) In the absence of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict made in the trial court within ten days after reception of the verdict, Rule 50(b) forbids the trial judge or an appellate court to enter such a judgment. P. 50.

(b) Defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict cannot be treated as a motion to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Pp. 50-51 .

(c) The trial judge’s express reservation of decision on the motion for a directed verdict did not relieve defendant from the duty under Rule 50(b) to make a motion after the verdict for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Pp. 51-54.

(d) Defendant is entitled only to a new trial, not to a judgment in its favor. P. 54.

194 F.2d 194, judgment vacated and cause remanded.

In a suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, for wrongful death, the District Court rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The Court of Appeals reversed. 194 F.2d 194. This Court granted certiorari. 343 U.S. 975. Judgment vacated and cause remanded, p. 54.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952) in 344 U.S. 48 344 U.S. 49. Original Sources, accessed January 19, 2020, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3TW6RQNLBPSLFSD.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952), in 344 U.S. 48, page 344 U.S. 49. Original Sources. 19 Jan. 2020. www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3TW6RQNLBPSLFSD.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Johnson v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 344 U.S. 48 (1952). cited in 1952, 344 U.S. 48, pp.344 U.S. 49. Original Sources, retrieved 19 January 2020, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3TW6RQNLBPSLFSD.