|
|
Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324 (1953)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324 (1953)
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, dissenting.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER desires that it be noted that he too would deny the motion to reconsider the power of this Court to review MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS’ order to stay the execution, but not because he thinks the matter is free from doubt. See his dissenting opinion in Ex parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578, 590, in connection with Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U.S. 697, and Carper v. Fitzgerald, 121 U.S. 87.
Contents:
Chicago: Black, "Black, J., Dissenting," Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324 (1953) in 346 U.S. 324 Original Sources, accessed May 11, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3U4BD3JI2HG2A3M.
MLA: Black. "Black, J., Dissenting." Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324 (1953), in 346 U.S. 324, Original Sources. 11 May. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3U4BD3JI2HG2A3M.
Harvard: Black, 'Black, J., Dissenting' in Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324 (1953). cited in 1953, 346 U.S. 324. Original Sources, retrieved 11 May 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3U4BD3JI2HG2A3M.
|