Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 223 U.S. 646, click here.

Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids


No. 163


Argued February 29, 1912
Decided March 11, 1912
223 U.S. 655

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF IOWA

Syllabus

Where the general power reserved to regulate rates is only limited by the Fourteenth Amendment, no franchise contract will be presumed to imply that the municipality under its reserved right to regulate rates must only reduce them to such a point that there will be a margin to allow a discount for prompt payment.

A municipal ordinance drawn in form of a contract to be accepted by the franchisee, when accepted, becomes a contract, and is subject to the reserved powers of the municipality as limited by the laws of the state.

The practice and decisions of this Court are that § 709 Rev.Stat. does not give to a writ of error to the state court in a chancery case the effect of an appeal from a judgment in such a case in the federal courts and open the evidence for reexamination in this Court.

Findings of the state court in cases either at law or in equity may depend upon questions that are reexaminable in this Court, which, if properly saved, must be answered, and this Court may examine the evidence insofar as necessary to do so in respect to rulings within the appellate jurisdiction of this Court. Kansas City Southern Railway v. Albers Commission Co., ante, p. 573.

Quaere whether a legislative rate, not in itself too low, is confiscatory because it is too low to permit a further reduction in the way of discount for cash payment.

The state court having treated a public utility corporation fairly as to value of plant depreciation, and found that the net returns would exceed six percent, and given it leave to try the case again after the legislative rate had been in effect, this Court does not feel warranted in reversing on the ground that the rate is confiscatory because in some details this Court might have treated the corporation differently.

144 Ia. 426 affirmed.

The facts, which involve the validity, under the contract and due process provisions of the Constitution of the United States, of an ordinance of the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, fixing the price of gas at ninety cents per thousand cubic feet, are stated in the opinion.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912) in 223 U.S. 655 223 U.S. 656–223 U.S. 666. Original Sources, accessed October 4, 2022, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3V82N3U63169CWI.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912), in 223 U.S. 655, pp. 223 U.S. 656–223 U.S. 666. Original Sources. 4 Oct. 2022. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3V82N3U63169CWI.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655 (1912). cited in 1912, 223 U.S. 655, pp.223 U.S. 656–223 U.S. 666. Original Sources, retrieved 4 October 2022, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3V82N3U63169CWI.