|
|
Lee Gon Yung v. United States, 185 U.S. 306 (1902)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lee Gon Yung v. United States, 185 U.S. 306 (1902)
Lee Gon Yung v. United States Argued January 7, 1902 Decided May 6, 1902 185 U.S. 306
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
Fok Yung Yo v. United States, ante,296, followed.
The authority of the government in prescribing regulations in respect of transit being unqualified, and the existing regulations not open to constitutional objection, the court below could not interfere by habeas corpus with the collector’s orders, and its ruling on an offer of evidence, the entire record considered, was not erroneous.
The case was argued with the preceding case by the same counsel.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lee Gon Yung v. United States, 185 U.S. 306 (1902) in 185 U.S. 306 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=42U966N67WDUVL5.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lee Gon Yung v. United States, 185 U.S. 306 (1902), in 185 U.S. 306, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=42U966N67WDUVL5.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lee Gon Yung v. United States, 185 U.S. 306 (1902). cited in 1902, 185 U.S. 306. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=42U966N67WDUVL5.
|