|
|
Atty. GEN. Of N.Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Atty. GEN. Of N.Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986)
JUSTICE WHITE, concurring in the judgment.
I agree with JUSTICE O’CONNOR that the right to travel is not sufficiently implicated in this case to require heightened scrutiny. Hence, I differ with JUSTICE BRENNAN in this respect. But I agree with THE CHIEF JUSTICE that the New York statute at issue denies equal protection of the laws because the classification it employs is irrational. I therefore concur in the judgment.
Contents:
Chicago: White, "White, J., Concurring," Atty. GEN. Of N.Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986) in 476 U.S. 898 Original Sources, accessed March 27, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=49GYNVLAF1KUSXA.
MLA: White. "White, J., Concurring." Atty. GEN. Of N.Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986), in 476 U.S. 898, Original Sources. 27 Mar. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=49GYNVLAF1KUSXA.
Harvard: White, 'White, J., Concurring' in Atty. GEN. Of N.Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986). cited in 1986, 476 U.S. 898. Original Sources, retrieved 27 March 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=49GYNVLAF1KUSXA.
|