|
Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 (1909)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 212 U.S. 536, click here.
Toy Toy v. Hopkins No. 49 Argued December 9, 1909 Decided February 23, 1909 212 U.S. 542
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Syllabus
After the circuit court of the United States has heard and passed on evidence affecting its jurisdiction, its judgment is open to review in the appellate court by writ of error, but the judgment cannot be attacked collaterally as absolutely void.
Even though the circuit court erroneously retains jurisdiction of a criminal case against an allottee Indian, its judgment is not void, but should be corrected on appeal or by writ of error and cannot be attacked in habeas corpus proceedings.
In re Heff, 197 U.S. 488, as explained in In re Lincoln, 202 U.S. 543, distinguished.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 (1909) in 212 U.S. 542 212 U.S. 543–212 U.S. 546. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4R92GXLQZTWPQT5.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 (1909), in 212 U.S. 542, pp. 212 U.S. 543–212 U.S. 546. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4R92GXLQZTWPQT5.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 (1909). cited in 1909, 212 U.S. 542, pp.212 U.S. 543–212 U.S. 546. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4R92GXLQZTWPQT5.
|