|
|
Lowe v. Pogue, 526 U.S. 273 (1999)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lowe v. Pogue, 526 U.S. 273 (1999)
Lowe v. Pogue No. 98-7591 Decided March 29, 1999 526 U.S. 273
ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Syllabus
Pro se petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on his petitions for certiorari. Including these petitions, he has had 31 frivolous filing with this Court.
Held: petitioner’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. He is barred from filing any further petitions for certiorari and for extraordinary writs in noncriminal cases unless he first pays the docketing fee and submits his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1.
Motions denied.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lowe v. Pogue, 526 U.S. 273 (1999) in 526 U.S. 273 Original Sources, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SQSZA62MTHTUMF.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lowe v. Pogue, 526 U.S. 273 (1999), in 526 U.S. 273, Original Sources. 30 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SQSZA62MTHTUMF.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lowe v. Pogue, 526 U.S. 273 (1999). cited in 1999, 526 U.S. 273. Original Sources, retrieved 30 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SQSZA62MTHTUMF.
|