Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 171 U.S. 1, click here.

Collins v. New Hampshire


No. 17


Argued March 23-24, 1898
Decided May 23, 1898
171 U.S. 30

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Syllabus

Following the decision in Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania, ante,1, the Court holds that the statute of New Hampshire prohibiting the sale of oleomargarine as a substitute for butter, unless it is of a pink color, is invalid as being, in necessary effect, prohibitory.

The case is stated in the opinion. It was argued with Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania, ante,1, by the same counsel for plaintiff in error.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898) in 171 U.S. 30 171 U.S. 31. Original Sources, accessed January 25, 2020, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SYTQ4JQH3WN586.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898), in 171 U.S. 30, page 171 U.S. 31. Original Sources. 25 Jan. 2020. www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SYTQ4JQH3WN586.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30 (1898). cited in 1898, 171 U.S. 30, pp.171 U.S. 31. Original Sources, retrieved 25 January 2020, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4SYTQ4JQH3WN586.