|
|
In Re Gaydos, 520 U.S. 59 (1996)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
In Re Gaydos, 520 U.S. 59 (1996)
In re Gaydos No. 96-5831 Decided December 2, 1996 520 U.S. 59
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Syllabus
Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis and requests this Court to issue a writ of mandamus. She has been denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis 10 times, and has filed at least 8 other petitions. Held: petitioner’s requests are denied. For the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (per curiam), the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions for certiorari or for extraordinary writs in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless she pays the required docketing fee and submits her petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1.
Motion denied.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," In Re Gaydos, 520 U.S. 59 (1996) in 520 U.S. 59 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4WR3CXTHLIMWCLE.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." In Re Gaydos, 520 U.S. 59 (1996), in 520 U.S. 59, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4WR3CXTHLIMWCLE.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in In Re Gaydos, 520 U.S. 59 (1996). cited in 1996, 520 U.S. 59. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4WR3CXTHLIMWCLE.
|