United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973)

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin


No. 71-862


Argued November 8, 1972
Decided March 5, 1973
410 U.S. 623

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS

Syllabus

The Illinois use tax was applied to appellant’s aviation fuel stored in the State and loaded aboard its aircraft there and consumed in interstate flights, the tax authorities having revised their previous "burn off" interpretation of a statutory exemption for temporary storage. Under the "burn off" interpretation, only fuel consumed in flight over Illinois was used to measure the tax imposed for storage before loading, but under the reinterpretation, all fuel loaded was deemed to measure the tax on the "use" of storage or withdrawal from storage. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the statute against appellant’s contention that the tax, as reinterpreted, impermissibly burdened interstate commerce.

Held:

1. The statute as authoritatively construed by the State’s highest court to tax storage, and not consumption, does not place an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. Edelman v. Boeing Air Transport, Inc., 289 U.S. 249; Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis R. Co. v. Wallace, 288 U.S. 249. Cases allowing the taxation of storage of fuel before loading have not outlived their usefulness. Pp. 626-630.

2. The "burn off" rule is not unconstitutional, being distinguishable from a tax imposed on consumption such as was invalidated in Helson v. Kentucky, 279 U.S. 245. Since some of the Illinois Supreme Court majority were under the mistaken impression that Helson precluded use of the "burn off" interpretation, the case is remanded to enable that court to construe the temporary storage provision under state law free from any constraint that such interpretation would not be constitutionally permissible. Pp. 630-632

49 Ill.2d 45, 273 N.E.2d 585, vacated and remanded.

BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, MARSHALL, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEWART and WHITE, JJ., joined, post, p. 632. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 639.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973) in 410 U.S. 623 410 U.S. 624. Original Sources, accessed October 4, 2022, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4YYTQ5ZJGT18ANB.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973), in 410 U.S. 623, page 410 U.S. 624. Original Sources. 4 Oct. 2022. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4YYTQ5ZJGT18ANB.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin, 410 U.S. 623 (1973). cited in 1973, 410 U.S. 623, pp.410 U.S. 624. Original Sources, retrieved 4 October 2022, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4YYTQ5ZJGT18ANB.