|
|
Liles v. Nebraska, 465 U.S. 1304 (1984)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Liles v. Nebraska, 465 U.S. 1304 (1984)
Liles v. Nebraska No. A-615 Decided February 13, 1984 465 U.S. 1304
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
Syllabus
An application for a stay, pending review by this Court, of a Nebraska District Court’s contempt order committing applicants to jail is denied because of lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2101(f), where, after the application was filed with the Circuit Justice, the Nebraska Supreme Court dismissed each applicant’s appeal from the contempt order to that court "for lack of an appealable order."
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Liles v. Nebraska, 465 U.S. 1304 (1984) in 465 U.S. 1304 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5XHLK9ECCJMS6EF.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Liles v. Nebraska, 465 U.S. 1304 (1984), in 465 U.S. 1304, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5XHLK9ECCJMS6EF.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Liles v. Nebraska, 465 U.S. 1304 (1984). cited in 1984, 465 U.S. 1304. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5XHLK9ECCJMS6EF.
|