United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 251 U.S. 401, click here.

United States v. Thompson


No. 250


Argued January 27, 28, 1920
Decided March 1, 1920
251 U.S. 407

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Syllabus

A judgment of the district court sustaining a so-called motion to quash, which in effect bars the United States from further prosecuting the alleged offense under the same or any other indictment, depriving the district attorney and the grand jury of their lawful powers over the subject, is subject to review by this Court under the Criminal Appeals Act as a "judgment sustaining a special plea in bar." P. 412.

The grand jury has power to inquire into and indict upon a charge which has previously been examined and ignored by another grand jury; the United States attorney has power to invoke such a reexamination, and the exercise of these powers is not subject to be denied at the discretion of the district court. P. 413.

Hence, a judgment quashing an indictment because the United States attorney did not obtain permission from the court to make the resubmission to the grand jury upon which the indictment was obtained is erroneous as invading the functions of the United States attorney and those of the grand jury. P. 413.

The rule governing the subject is general, based on the common law and the decisions of this Court, and is not subject to the decisions or statutes of the state in which the offense is committed and prosecuted. P. 415.

Section 722 of the Revised Statutes, in the criminal cases to which it relates, adopts the state practice only in the absence of a federal rule governing the matter in question. Id.

Application for writs of mandamus and prohibition to control the district court are disallowed when the relief sought is afforded through a writ of error. P. 417.

Reversed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920) in 251 U.S. 407 251 U.S. 408. Original Sources, accessed June 2, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=652S1IZUAMTX5L8.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920), in 251 U.S. 407, page 251 U.S. 408. Original Sources. 2 Jun. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=652S1IZUAMTX5L8.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407 (1920). cited in 1920, 251 U.S. 407, pp.251 U.S. 408. Original Sources, retrieved 2 June 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=652S1IZUAMTX5L8.