|
|
Hicks v. Knost, 178 U.S. 541 (1900)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hicks v. Knost, 178 U.S. 541 (1900)
Hicks v. Knost No. 612 Submitted May 14, 1900 Decided May 28, 1900 178 U.S. 541
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
A district court of the United States has jurisdiction, by the proposed defendant’s consent, but not otherwise, to entertain a bill in equity by a trustee in bankruptcy to recover property conveyed to the defendant by the bankrupt in fraud of the Bankrupt Act and of his creditors. Bardes v. Hawarden Bank, ante,524, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hicks v. Knost, 178 U.S. 541 (1900) in 178 U.S. 541 Original Sources, accessed October 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6HRIYLHH393MKDY.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hicks v. Knost, 178 U.S. 541 (1900), in 178 U.S. 541, Original Sources. 30 Oct. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6HRIYLHH393MKDY.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hicks v. Knost, 178 U.S. 541 (1900). cited in 1900, 178 U.S. 541. Original Sources, retrieved 30 October 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6HRIYLHH393MKDY.
|