Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976)

Texas v. Louisiana


No. 36, Orig.


Argued January 19, 1976
Decided June 14, 1976
426 U.S. 465

ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER

Syllabus

Louisiana’s exception to the portion of the Special Master’s report that marks the boundary line between Louisiana and Texas in the Sabine River as it enters into Sabine Lake through the "middle pass," rather than in the geographic middle of the "west pass," is overruled, where the Special Master’s determination is consistent with this Court’s rejection of the thalweg doctrine in Texas v. Louisiana, 410 U.S. 702; and Texas’ exceptions to the Special Master’s delimitation of the lateral seaward boundary are overruled, where the Special Master, after having correctly concluded that there has never been an established offshore boundary between the States, correctly applied the Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, Arts. 12 and 8 of which clearly require that the median line be measured with reference to the jetties at the mouth of the Sabine River.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976) in 426 U.S. 465 Original Sources, accessed May 20, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6XY9F4U2GD1845C.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976), in 426 U.S. 465, Original Sources. 20 May. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6XY9F4U2GD1845C.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Texas v. Louisiana, 426 U.S. 465 (1976). cited in 1976, 426 U.S. 465. Original Sources, retrieved 20 May 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6XY9F4U2GD1845C.