|
|
Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973)
Holtzman v. Schlesinger No. A-150 Decided August 1, 1973 414 U.S. 1304
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY
Syllabus
Application to vacate stay of Court of Appeals’ order staying District Court’s permanent injunction prohibiting respondent Defense Department officials from "participating in any way in military activities in or over Cambodia or releasing any bombs which may fall in Cambodia" is denied, as MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL cannot say, in light of the complexity and importance of the issues posed, that the Court of Appeals abused its discretion. The highly controversial constitutional question involving the two other branches of the Government should follow the regular appellate procedures on the accelerated schedule suggested by the Court of Appeals.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973) in 414 U.S. 1304 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=78LR4B641KVJ1ML.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973), in 414 U.S. 1304, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=78LR4B641KVJ1ML.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973). cited in 1973, 414 U.S. 1304. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=78LR4B641KVJ1ML.
|