|
|
Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 (1922)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 (1922)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 259 U.S. 13, click here.
Bailey v. George No. 590 Argued March 7, 8, 1922 Decided May 15, 1922 259 U.S. 16
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
A bill to enjoin a levy and sale of property to satisfy a penalty prescribed as a tax by an unconstitutional act of Congress will not lie in face of the inhibition of Rev.Stats. § 3224 when it sets up no extraordinary circumstances rendering that section inapplicable and exhibits no reason why the legal remedy of payment under protest and action to recover would not be adequate. P. 19.
274 F. 639 reversed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court permanently enjoining a collector and his deputy from collecting an assessment under the Federal Child Labor Tax Law. See also Child Labor Tax case, post 20.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 (1922) in 259 U.S. 16 259 U.S. 19. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7ZGRP36FA7BN7JD.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 (1922), in 259 U.S. 16, page 259 U.S. 19. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7ZGRP36FA7BN7JD.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 (1922). cited in 1922, 259 U.S. 16, pp.259 U.S. 19. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=7ZGRP36FA7BN7JD.
|