|
Burton v. New York Central & H.R. R. Co., 245 U.S. 315 (1917)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Burton v. New York Central & H.R. R. Co., 245 U.S. 315 (1917)
Burton v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company Nos. 71 , 72 Argued November 21, 1917 Decided December 10, 1917 245 U.S. 315
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Article IV, § 2, subdivision 2, of the Constitution places no limitation upon the power of the states to arrest in advance of extradition proceedings; with Rev.Stats., § 5278, it deals merely with the conditions under which one state may demand rendition from another and under which the alleged fugitive may resist compliance by the state upon which the demand is made.
147 App.Div. 557, 210 N.Y. 567, affirmed.
The cases are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Burton v. New York Central & H.R. R. Co., 245 U.S. 315 (1917) in 245 U.S. 315 245 U.S. 316. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SBCTUDSG41I44X.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Burton v. New York Central & H.R. R. Co., 245 U.S. 315 (1917), in 245 U.S. 315, page 245 U.S. 316. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SBCTUDSG41I44X.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Burton v. New York Central & H.R. R. Co., 245 U.S. 315 (1917). cited in 1917, 245 U.S. 315, pp.245 U.S. 316. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=8SBCTUDSG41I44X.
|