|
|
Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976)
Idaho ex rel. Andrus v. Oregon No. 67, Orig. Argued November 8, 1976 Decided December 7, 1976 429 U.S. 163
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT
Syllabus
Without determining whether the bill of complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, Idaho’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is granted to the extent that the complaint prays that the Court declare Idaho entitled as against Oregon and Washington to an equitable portion of the upriver anadromous fishery of the Columbia River Basin and that the Court determine such portion on the evidence and award costs and incidental relief, but is denied in all other respects.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976) in 429 U.S. 163 Original Sources, accessed September 19, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=93VPLUE7YMC1UQT.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976), in 429 U.S. 163, Original Sources. 19 Sep. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=93VPLUE7YMC1UQT.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976). cited in 1976, 429 U.S. 163. Original Sources, retrieved 19 September 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=93VPLUE7YMC1UQT.
|