Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901)

Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 183 U.S. 185, click here.

Wilson v. Nelson

No. 31

Submitted April 22, 1901
Decided December 9, 1901
183 U.S. 191



When a debtor, years before the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, gives to a creditor an irrevocable power of attorney to confess judgment after maturity upon a promissory note of the debtor, and the creditor, within four months before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy against the debtor, obtains such a judgment and execution thereon, and the debtor fails at least five days before a sale on the execution, to vacate or discharge the judgment, or to file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, the judgment and execution are a preference "suffered or permitted" by the debtor, within the meaning of the Bankrupt Act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 3, cl. 3, and the debtor’s failure to vacate or discharge the preference so obtained is an act of bankruptcy under that act.

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit certified to this Court the following statement of facts and questions of law:

On February 5, 1885, Cassius B. Nelson executed and delivered to Sarah Johnstone his promissory note in writing for the sum of $8,960, payable "five years or before after date," with interest at the rate of four percent per annum until paid. To this note was attached an irrevocable power of attorney, duly executed by the said Nelson under his hand and seal in the usual form, authorizing any attorney of any court of record in his name to confess judgment thereon after maturity of the note. This note was given for so much money at the time loaned to Nelson, and the interest on the note was paid from time to time up to November 1, 1898. Nelson was a trader, and entered into business as such at the City of Madison, Wisconsin, soon after the giving of the note, and carried on such business until his stock in trade was levied upon by the sheriff under execution as hereinafter stated. On November 1, 1898, Nelson, as he well knew, was and had long been insolvent, and thereafter continued to be and is now insolvent, his liabilities largely exceeding his assets.

On November 21, 1898, Sarah Johnstone caused judgment to be duly entered in the Circuit Court of the State of Wisconsin for the County of Dane against said Nelson upon the note and warrant of attorney aforesaid for the sum of $8,975, damages and costs, being the face of the note and $15 costs. Upon that judgment execution was immediately thereafter issued out of the court to the sheriff of that county, who thereunder and by authority thereof on the same day levied upon the stock and goods of Nelson, and thereafter and on December 15, 1898, sold the same at public auction, and applied the proceeds thereof, to-wit, the sum of $4,400, upon and in part payment of the judgment so rendered. This proceeding left the said Nelson without means to meet any other of his obligations. The judgment was so entered and the levy made without the procurement of Nelson and without his knowledge or consent. Such judgment was not subject to attack by Nelson, and could not have been vacated or discharged by any legal proceedings which might have been instituted by him in that behalf, nor could the levy under the execution issued upon such judgment have been set aside or vacated by Nelson, except by his filing his voluntary petition in bankruptcy prior to the sale, and obtaining an adjudication of bankruptcy thereunder, or by payment of the judgment.

On December 10, 1898, creditors of the said Nelson, of the requisite number and holding debts against him to the requisite amount, filed their petition against the said Nelson in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin, sitting in bankruptcy, to procure an adjudication against him as a bankrupt. The act of bankruptcy therein alleged was in substance that, while insolvent, he suffered and permitted the said Sarah Johnstone, one of his creditors, to obtain preference upon his property through legal proceeding, by the entry of the said judgment and the levy thereunder upon his stock of goods, and failed to vacate or discharge the preference obtained through such legal proceedings at least five days before the sale of the property under such judgment and execution. Upon issue joined, the district court ruled that the said Nelson had not, by reason of the premises, committed an act of bankruptcy, and this ruling is before us for review.

The questions of law upon which this court desires the advice and instruction of the Supreme Court are:

1. Whether the said Cassius B. Nelson, by failure to file his voluntary petition in bankruptcy before the sale under such levy, and to procure thereon an adjudication of bankruptcy, or by his failure to pay and discharge the judgment before the sale under such levy, committed an act of bankruptcy, within the meaning of section 3a, subdivision (3), of the Bankrupt Act.

2. Whether the judgment so entered and the levy of the execution thereon was a preference "suffered" or "permitted" by the said Nelson within the meaning of clause (3) of section 3a of the Bankrupt Law.

3. Whether the failure of Nelson to vacate and discharge the preference so obtained, if it was one, at least five days before the execution sale was an act of bankruptcy.


Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options

Title: Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options

Title: Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901) in 183 U.S. 191 183 U.S. 192–183 U.S. 193. Original Sources, accessed February 3, 2023, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=943KNH7LVHLAQRK.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901), in 183 U.S. 191, pp. 183 U.S. 192–183 U.S. 193. Original Sources. 3 Feb. 2023. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=943KNH7LVHLAQRK.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wilson v. Nelson, 183 U.S. 191 (1901). cited in 1901, 183 U.S. 191, pp.183 U.S. 192–183 U.S. 193. Original Sources, retrieved 3 February 2023, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=943KNH7LVHLAQRK.