Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 244 U.S. 571, click here.

Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Company v. Reynolds


No. 220


Submitted April 25, 1917
Decided June 11, 1917
244 U.S. 574

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Syllabus

City ordinances granting street railway franchises in the State of Washington, with the right at any and all times to make reasonable rules and regulations for the management and operation of the railway lines thereby authorized, contained a proviso that such rules and regulations should not conflict with the laws of the state. Held: (1) that the proviso, fairly construed, meant the laws as they should from time to time exist; (2) that the act establishing the Public Service Commission of Washington (Laws 1911, c. 117), and orders of the commission requiring the appellant company to run through cars beyond the limits of the lines covered by such franchises over other parts of its system, were within the description of the proviso, and so did not impair its contract rights (if such they were) to make such rules and regulations.

A municipality cannot, by contract with a street railway company, foreclose the exercise of the police power of the state in respect of the regulation of rates of fare and transfer privileges unless clearly authorized to do so by the supreme legislative power. Detroit United Railway v. Michigan, 242 U.S. 238, distinguished.

Under the Constitution of Washington, which antedated the ordinances here in question, contractual provisions in franchises conferred by municipal corporations without express legislative authority are subject to be set aside by the legislature, and the Public Utilities Act, supra, supersedes any conflicting ordinance or charter provision of a city.

Where several street railway lines, built under distinct franchises, are owned and operated as one system, a public regulation concerning car service and fares will not be adjudged confiscatory because of its financial results to the line immediately affected if the system as a whole remains profitable.

Where several street railway lines, built under distinct franchises, are owned and operated as one system, it is clearly within the bounds of reasonable regulation to establish, through service between them, for a single fare.

223 F. 371 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917) in 244 U.S. 574 244 U.S. 575. Original Sources, accessed February 7, 2023, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9EYEASWB7UCPQ57.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917), in 244 U.S. 574, page 244 U.S. 575. Original Sources. 7 Feb. 2023. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9EYEASWB7UCPQ57.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Puget Sound Traction Co. v. Reynolds, 244 U.S. 574 (1917). cited in 1917, 244 U.S. 574, pp.244 U.S. 575. Original Sources, retrieved 7 February 2023, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=9EYEASWB7UCPQ57.