|
|
Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U.S. 113 (1899)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U.S. 113 (1899)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 173 U.S. 99, click here.
Bausman v. Dixon No. 197 Argued and submitted January 25, 1899 Decided February 20, 1899 173 U.S. 113
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Syllabus
A receiver of a railroad in a state, appointed by a circuit court of the United States, is not authorized by the fact of such appointment to bring here for review a judgment in a court of the state against him when no other cause exists to give this Court jurisdiction.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U.S. 113 (1899) in 173 U.S. 113 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A28GDQW3YTLLXVR.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U.S. 113 (1899), in 173 U.S. 113, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A28GDQW3YTLLXVR.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U.S. 113 (1899). cited in 1899, 173 U.S. 113. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=A28GDQW3YTLLXVR.
|