|
|
Hayakawa v. Brown, 415 U.S. 1304 (1974)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Hayakawa v. Brown, 415 U.S. 1304 (1974)
Hayakawa v. Brown No. A-839 Decided March 4, 1974 415 U.S. 1304
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND RESTRAINING ORDER
Syllabus
Application for stay of California Supreme Court’s order denying mandamus to require state officials to accept applicant’s nomination papers as candidate for the United States Senate, and for order restraining the officials from refusing to accept the papers, is denied, where the application does not disclose whether the state court’s denial of mandamus rested on an independent state, rather than a federal, ground.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Hayakawa v. Brown, 415 U.S. 1304 (1974) in 415 U.S. 1304 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBREMHFU93ILW4Z.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Hayakawa v. Brown, 415 U.S. 1304 (1974), in 415 U.S. 1304, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBREMHFU93ILW4Z.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Hayakawa v. Brown, 415 U.S. 1304 (1974). cited in 1974, 415 U.S. 1304. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BBREMHFU93ILW4Z.
|