|
|
John Woods & Sons v. Carl, 203 U.S. 358 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
John Woods & Sons v. Carl, 203 U.S. 358 (1906)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 203 U.S. 347, click here.
John Woods & Sons v. Carl No. 102 Submitted November 7, 1906 Decided December 3, 1906 203 U.S. 358
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS
Syllabus
Allen v. Riley, ante, p. 347 followed a to power of a state to require one selling patent rights to record the letters patent and applied to a law of Arkansas, which also make a note void if given for a patent right if the note doe not show on its face for what it was given.
75 Ark. 328 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," John Woods & Sons v. Carl, 203 U.S. 358 (1906) in 203 U.S. 358 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BT9B344UF2XVS5C.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." John Woods & Sons v. Carl, 203 U.S. 358 (1906), in 203 U.S. 358, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BT9B344UF2XVS5C.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in John Woods & Sons v. Carl, 203 U.S. 358 (1906). cited in 1906, 203 U.S. 358. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=BT9B344UF2XVS5C.
|