|
|
Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 249 U.S. 323, click here.
Lane v. Darlington No. 219 Argued March 12, 1919 Decided March 31, 1919 249 U.S. 331
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
An official resurvey of the boundary of a patented Mexican grant, for the purpose of defining contiguous public land, does not operate as an adjudication against the grant owner or otherwise so affect his rights as to afford him ground for an injunction suit against the Secretary of the Interior.
46 App.D.C. 465 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919) in 249 U.S. 331 249 U.S. 332. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C5H42RJHPYWC27S.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919), in 249 U.S. 331, page 249 U.S. 332. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C5H42RJHPYWC27S.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919). cited in 1919, 249 U.S. 331, pp.249 U.S. 332. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=C5H42RJHPYWC27S.
|