|
|
Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936)
Wallace v. Cutten No. 747 Argued April 27, 1936 Decided May 18, 1936 298 U.S. 229
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Section 6(b) of the Grain Futures Act, which provides that, if the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that any person "is violating" the Act or the regulations thereunder, or "is attempting" to manipulate the market price of grain in violation of the Act, he may require such person to show cause why he should not be suspended from trading in Contract Markets, cannot be construed as authorizing suspension for wrongdoing that occurred more than two years before the filing of the complaint with the Secretary. P. 236.
80 F.2d 140 affirmed.
Certiorari, 297 U.S. 701, to review a decree setting aside on appeal an order whereby the commission established by the Grain Futures Act directed all "contract markets" (grain exchanges designated by the Secretary of Agriculture) to refuse to the respondent Cutten all trading privileges for the period of two years.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936) in 298 U.S. 229 298 U.S. 234. Original Sources, accessed July 5, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D2PIQ3RSJ1NIQCP.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936), in 298 U.S. 229, page 298 U.S. 234. Original Sources. 5 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D2PIQ3RSJ1NIQCP.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936). cited in 1936, 298 U.S. 229, pp.298 U.S. 234. Original Sources, retrieved 5 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D2PIQ3RSJ1NIQCP.
|