|
|
Wall v. Cox, 181 U.S. 244 (1901)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wall v. Cox, 181 U.S. 244 (1901)
Wall v. Cox No. 604 Submitted April 16, 1901 Decided April 29, 1901 181 U.S. 244
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Under the Bankrupt Act of 1898, the district court of the United States
in which proceedings in bankruptcy are pending has no jurisdiction, unless by consent of the defendants, of a bill in equity by the trustee in bankruptcy against persons to whom the bankrupt, before the proceedings in bankruptcy, made a sale and conveyance of property which the plaintiff seeks to set aside as fraudulent as against creditors, but which the defendants assert to have been made in good faith and to have vested title in them.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wall v. Cox, 181 U.S. 244 (1901) in 181 U.S. 244 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D9JCLFFGMY7Z484.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wall v. Cox, 181 U.S. 244 (1901), in 181 U.S. 244, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D9JCLFFGMY7Z484.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wall v. Cox, 181 U.S. 244 (1901). cited in 1901, 181 U.S. 244. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=D9JCLFFGMY7Z484.
|