|
|
Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363 (1958)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363 (1958)
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, with whom MR. JUSTICE BURTON and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER concur, dissenting.
It is for us to say whether the one-year sentence was improper, rather than to pass on the adequacy of time already served on other judgments. Petitioner has served but 15 days on this sentence, and I therefore dissent from the judgment releasing her.
Contents:
Chicago:
Clark, "Clark, J., Dissenting," Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363 (1958) in 356 U.S. 363 Original Sources, accessed July 12, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DL3PG8RG49VNT8C.
MLA:
Clark. "Clark, J., Dissenting." Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363 (1958), in 356 U.S. 363, Original Sources. 12 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DL3PG8RG49VNT8C.
Harvard:
Clark, 'Clark, J., Dissenting' in Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363 (1958). cited in 1958, 356 U.S. 363. Original Sources, retrieved 12 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=DL3PG8RG49VNT8C.
|