|
|
Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174 (1923)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174 (1923)
Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc. No. 242 Argued January 18, 1923 Decided February 19, 1923 261 U.S. 174
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Under the provision of the Copyright Act that suits "may be instituted in the district of which the defendant or his agent is an inhabitant, or in which he may be found," jurisdiction cannot be acquired over a corporation in a district where it has no office and does no business, by serving process on its president while there temporarily and not on business of the corporation. P. 177.
Affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the district court quashing service of a subpoena ad respondendum.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174 (1923) in 261 U.S. 174 261 U.S. 176. Original Sources, accessed November 3, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EX15RZAQE28DPDX.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174 (1923), in 261 U.S. 174, page 261 U.S. 176. Original Sources. 3 Nov. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EX15RZAQE28DPDX.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc., 261 U.S. 174 (1923). cited in 1923, 261 U.S. 174, pp.261 U.S. 176. Original Sources, retrieved 3 November 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=EX15RZAQE28DPDX.
|