|
|
Eaton v. Brown, 193 U.S. 411 (1904)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Eaton v. Brown, 193 U.S. 411 (1904)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 193 U.S. 197, click here.
Eaton v. Brown No. 171 Submitted March 3, 1904 Decided March 14, 1904 193 U.S. 411
APPEAL FROM AND ERRO TO THE COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
Courts do not incline to regard a will as conditional where it reasonably can be held that the testator was merely expressing his inducement to make it, although his language, if strictly construed, would express a condition.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Eaton v. Brown, 193 U.S. 411 (1904) in 193 U.S. 411 193 U.S. 412. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GP3XE3MSPU2UJJH.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Eaton v. Brown, 193 U.S. 411 (1904), in 193 U.S. 411, page 193 U.S. 412. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GP3XE3MSPU2UJJH.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Eaton v. Brown, 193 U.S. 411 (1904). cited in 1904, 193 U.S. 411, pp.193 U.S. 412. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=GP3XE3MSPU2UJJH.
|