|
|
United States v. Moseley, 187 U.S. 322 (1902)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Moseley, 187 U.S. 322 (1902)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 187 U.S. 315, click here.
United States v. Moseley No. 248 Argued October 28, 1902 Decided December 1, 1902 187 U.S. 322
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
The Secretary of the Interstate Commerce Commission is entitled to be reimbursed for telegrams sent by him pursuant to directions of the Commission, on presenting vouchers in the form prescribed by law to the proper auditing officer of the Treasury Department, approved by the chairman of the Commission and accompanied by the request of the chairman that the rules of the Comptroller as to the production of copies of telegrams for which credit is asked be disregarded on account of the confidential character of the messages, the Secretary having also offered to submit the books of the Commission to the Comptroller and Auditors of the Treasury.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Moseley, 187 U.S. 322 (1902) in 187 U.S. 322 Original Sources, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H4MIDAPP6LDWKUU.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Moseley, 187 U.S. 322 (1902), in 187 U.S. 322, Original Sources. 30 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H4MIDAPP6LDWKUU.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Moseley, 187 U.S. 322 (1902). cited in 1902, 187 U.S. 322. Original Sources, retrieved 30 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=H4MIDAPP6LDWKUU.
|