|
|
Aikins v. Kingsbury, 247 U.S. 484 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Aikins v. Kingsbury, 247 U.S. 484 (1918)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 247 U.S. 477, click here.
Aikins v. Kingsbury No. 265 Submitted April 25, 1918 Decided June 10, 1918 247 U.S. 484
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
By the law as it was when he bought, a purchaser of state lands in default as to interest on a deferred payment was liable to have his interest in the land and in the contract foreclosed by a court proceeding begun on summary notice, but subject to his right to redeem by paying interest and costs within 20 days from judgment. An act was passed declaring forfeiture in such cases in which the default had continued for five years and in which the state, prior to the passage of the act, had issued another certificate for the same land to a subsequent purchaser, unless all arrears of interest were paid within 6 months of its passage. Held a change of remedy, not impairing the obligation of the contract of purchase.
One whose contract for the purchase of state lands had been for many years in default for nonpayment of interest both before and after the passage of a law forfeiting such contracts if the interest were not paid within a time stated, and who conceded the default and offered no excuse, held not in a position to object that the law lacked due process in failing to allow time and opportunity for testing the liability to forfeiture in a court proceeding.
170 Cal. 674 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Aikins v. Kingsbury, 247 U.S. 484 (1918) in 247 U.S. 484 247 U.S. 485. Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HM7R4ASZUPXYU2Z.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Aikins v. Kingsbury, 247 U.S. 484 (1918), in 247 U.S. 484, page 247 U.S. 485. Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HM7R4ASZUPXYU2Z.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Aikins v. Kingsbury, 247 U.S. 484 (1918). cited in 1918, 247 U.S. 484, pp.247 U.S. 485. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=HM7R4ASZUPXYU2Z.
|