|
Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 250 U.S. 208, click here.
Dana v. Dana No. 276 Argued March 24, 1919 Decided June 2, 1919 250 U.S. 220
ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
Syllabus
A judgment holding certain shares of such a character as to come within the general succession tax of the state, though the tax was opposed as reaching real property outside of the state, held not to involve the validity of the tax statute or of an authority exercised under the state, and hence not to be reviewable by writ of error under Jud.Code, § 237, as amended in 1916.
Writ of error to review 227 Mass. 562, dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919) in 250 U.S. 220 250 U.S. 221. Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IJMI5E48QKZBDVM.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919), in 250 U.S. 220, page 250 U.S. 221. Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IJMI5E48QKZBDVM.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919). cited in 1919, 250 U.S. 220, pp.250 U.S. 221. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IJMI5E48QKZBDVM.
|