|
|
Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1 (1993)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1 (1993)
Day v. Day No. 92-8788 Decided October 12, 1993 * 510 U.S. 1
ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Syllabus
Since this Court’s Rule 39.8 was first invoked in June, 1993, to deny pro se petitioner Day in forma pauperis status, he has filed eight more petitions for certiorari, all of them demonstrably frivolous.
Held: Day is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant cases, and the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from him in noncriminal matters unless he pays the required docketing fee and submits his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. This order will free the Court’s limited resources to consider the claims of those petitioners who, unlike Day, have noty abused the certiorari process.
Motions denied.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1 (1993) in 510 U.S. 1 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IKPT1JDWKCH7HS6.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1 (1993), in 510 U.S. 1, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IKPT1JDWKCH7HS6.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Day v. Day, 510 U.S. 1 (1993). cited in 1993, 510 U.S. 1. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=IKPT1JDWKCH7HS6.
|