|
Smith v. United States, 423 U.S. 1303 (1975)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Smith v. United States, 423 U.S. 1303 (1975)
Smith v. United States No. A-230 Decided September 11, 1975 423 U.S. 1303
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
Syllabus
Application for stay of District Court’s order that the files and records of the federal grand jury that indicated applicants be turned over to a state prosecutor contemplating state prosecution of applicants, is granted pending appeal. There are substantial questions whether (1) the state prosecutor’s claimed need for such materials meets the "compelling necessity" standard for disclosure set forth in Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(e), since, inter alia, it is likely that applicants cannot be prosecuted at all under California’s double jeopardy provision, (2) the turnover order would nullify the immunity granted to certain federal grand jury witnesses, (3) such order should include illegally seized evidence, and (4) double jeopardy might preclude state prosecution.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Smith v. United States, 423 U.S. 1303 (1975) in 423 U.S. 1303 Original Sources, accessed July 1, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=INKHUF3QBU7J5WS.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Smith v. United States, 423 U.S. 1303 (1975), in 423 U.S. 1303, Original Sources. 1 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=INKHUF3QBU7J5WS.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Smith v. United States, 423 U.S. 1303 (1975). cited in 1975, 423 U.S. 1303. Original Sources, retrieved 1 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=INKHUF3QBU7J5WS.
|