|
Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13 (1922)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13 (1922)
Atherton Mills v. Johnston No. 16 Argued December 10, 1919 Restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921 [U.S. Reports citation not yet available]
Decided May 15, 1922 259 U.S. 13
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
A father and minor son secured a permanent injunction preventing a manufacturer from discharging the son from employment in consequence of the Federal Child Labor Tax Law upon the ground that the law was unconstitutional, but, pending an appeal, the son ceased to be within the ages affected by the statute. Held that, as the case had become moot, the merits could not be considered, but the decree should be reversed with direction to dismiss the bill without costs. P. 15.
Reversed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court granting a permanent injunction. See Child Labor Tax Case, post,20.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13 (1922) in 259 U.S. 13 Original Sources, accessed August 30, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JS8TNXMFKE4YNGK.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13 (1922), in 259 U.S. 13, Original Sources. 30 Aug. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JS8TNXMFKE4YNGK.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13 (1922). cited in 1922, 259 U.S. 13. Original Sources, retrieved 30 August 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=JS8TNXMFKE4YNGK.
|