|
|
Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969)
Orozco v. Texas No. 641 Argued February 26, 1969 Decided March 25, 1969 394 U.S. 324
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Syllabus
Use of admissions at petitioner’s trial for murder which were obtained by officers who, while he was in their custody in his bedroom at the boardinghouse where he lived, questioned him about incriminating facts without first informing him of his rights to remain silent, to have a lawyer’s advice before making a statement, and to have lawyer appointed to assist him if he could not afford to hire one, held to have violated Self-Incrimination Clause of Fifth Amendment made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Pp. 326-327.
428 S.W.2d 666, reversed.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969) in 394 U.S. 324 Original Sources, accessed November 3, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KBSK55ZVHGETCGF.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969), in 394 U.S. 324, Original Sources. 3 Nov. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KBSK55ZVHGETCGF.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969). cited in 1969, 394 U.S. 324. Original Sources, retrieved 3 November 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=KBSK55ZVHGETCGF.
|