Detroit v. Parker, 181 U.S. 399 (1901)

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, with whom concurred MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, dissenting.

The controlling question in the above case is the same as is presented in French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante,324, Wight v. Davidson, ante,371, and Tonawanda v. Lyon, ante,389, just decided. For reasons stated in my opinions in those cases, I dissent from the opinion and judgment of the Court in this case.