Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960)

Contents:
Author: Charles Evans Whittaker

Show Summary

Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960)

MR. JUSTICE WITTAKER, concurring.

I join the Court’s opinion, but desire to add a word. MR. JUSTICE CLARK’s clear, full, and accurate statement of the facts demonstrates errors by nearly everyone having to do with the case in the lower courts except the Government; yet it lost the case on appeal.

Petitioner, though not charged by the indictment with a "subsidiary conspiracy," nevertheless asked, and induced the court to give in his very words, a charge to the jury saying that, unless they found a "subsidiary conspiracy," they should acquit him. There being neither charge in the indictment nor evidence in the record of "subsidiary conspiracy," the requested and obtained charge to the jury amounted to a virtual direction to acquit. And if the jury, in obedience to that charge, had acquitted, its verdict would, of course, have ended the case. Therefore, petitioner, by requesting and inducing the court to give this erroneous charge, got much more than he was entitled to under the law. Yet he claimed in the Court of Appeals that this very charge, because unsupported by evidence, was erroneous, and required an outright reversal. The Court of Appeals, though finding adequate evidence to support the indictment, first took that view. It seems plain to me that petitioner, having asked and obtained an erroneous but far more favorable charge than he was entitled to, certainly invited the error, benefited by it, and surely may not be heard to attack it as prejudicial to him, especially when, as seems quite plain, it was prejudicial only to the Government. I realize there is no profit in decrying a spent transaction, but I cannot resist observing the obvious -- namely, that, in these circumstances, the law required affirmance of the judgment.

After the Court of Appeals had written its original opinion reversing, the Government, in an effort to salvage the case, timely moved for a rehearing, saying, in effect:

Perhaps, we were in error in not objecting to the charge requested by the accused, and given by the court to the jury, on "subsidiary conspiracy," but we should at least have an opportunity to retry the case.

The Court of Appeals then agreed with the Government’s forced contention, and accordingly modified its opinion and remanded the case for a new trial. Petitioner complains of this, urging that the court’s original opinion "acquitted" him, and that to try him again would violate the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against double jeopardy. That contention, it seems to me, is totally devoid of merit. The Court of Appeals rendered but one judgment in the case, and it was one remanding for a new trial. Petitioner, instead of complaining that he was given only a new trial, should be thankful that his conviction was not affirmed.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: Charles Evans Whittaker, "Whittaker, J., Concurring," Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960) in 361 U.S. 416 361 U.S. 429–361 U.S. 430. Original Sources, accessed March 29, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L463A1SZGAGBT24.

MLA: Whittaker, Charles Evans. "Whittaker, J., Concurring." Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960), in 361 U.S. 416, pp. 361 U.S. 429–361 U.S. 430. Original Sources. 29 Mar. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L463A1SZGAGBT24.

Harvard: Whittaker, CE, 'Whittaker, J., Concurring' in Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (1960). cited in 1960, 361 U.S. 416, pp.361 U.S. 429–361 U.S. 430. Original Sources, retrieved 29 March 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=L463A1SZGAGBT24.