|
|
Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978)
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring in the judgment.
Agreeing that a jury of fewer than six persons would fail to represent the sense of the community, and hence not satisfy the fair cross-section requirement of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, I concur in the judgment of reversal.
Contents:
Chicago:
White, "White, J., Concurring," Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978) in 435 U.S. 223 Original Sources, accessed July 13, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LI9JH5KWBSBD3AF.
MLA:
White. "White, J., Concurring." Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978), in 435 U.S. 223, Original Sources. 13 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LI9JH5KWBSBD3AF.
Harvard:
White, 'White, J., Concurring' in Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978). cited in 1978, 435 U.S. 223. Original Sources, retrieved 13 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LI9JH5KWBSBD3AF.
|