|
Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (1902)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (1902)
Michigan Sugar Company v. Michigan Argued March 20-21, 1902 Decided April 7, 1902 185 U.S. 112
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Syllabus
The rule reiterated that this Court has no jurisdiction under the third division of section 709 of the Revised Statutes unless the party seeking the writ of error has unmistakably invoked for the protection of an asserted right, title, privilege or immunity, the Constitution, or some treaty, statute, commission, or authority, of the United States.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (1902) in 185 U.S. 112 Original Sources, accessed June 16, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LIIRY7QPQ3UY7JG.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (1902), in 185 U.S. 112, Original Sources. 16 Jun. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LIIRY7QPQ3UY7JG.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (1902). cited in 1902, 185 U.S. 112. Original Sources, retrieved 16 June 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LIIRY7QPQ3UY7JG.
|