Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915)

Contents:
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Show Summary

Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 237 U.S. 159, click here.

Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Company


No. 139


Submitted January 18, 1915
Decided April 5, 1915
237 U.S. 162

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BAYFIELD COUNTY,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

Syllabus

An entryman’s interest prior to actual possession is more than mere color of title. From the time of the entry, the homesteader has the right of possession as against trespassers and all others except the United States.

The title of a homesteader, while inchoate, is subject to be defeated only by his failure to comply with the requirements of the statute, and so long as he complies therewith, he has an inceptive title sufficient as against third parties to support suits in equity or at law.

A homesteader has a preferential right to the land, and when he receives a patent vesting in him the complete legal title, it relates back to the date of the initiatory act so as to cut off intervening claimants.

Under special circumstances such as are present in this case, a homesteader may maintain an action for trespass against one cutting timber on the land entered and recover from the wrongdoer and retain for his own use the value of that which has been taken notwithstanding the trespasser has settled with the government and paid an amount in satisfaction for the timber taken.

Although, until patent issues, the land entered is under the control of the Land Department, the power of that Department is not unlimited or arbitrary, and cannot be exercised without notice to the homesteader and opportunity to be heard, and it is open to the homesteader to seek redress in the courts for wrong done to his interests by an unwarranted compromise.

In this case, the facts do not show knowledge on the homesteader’s part of the facts sufficient to charge him with ratification, and quaere whether ratification can be inferred from a mere demand on his part without benefits accruing to him as the result thereof.

Quaere as to the right of the trespasser against whom judgment is rendered in such a case to require from the homesteader an assignment of his claim against the government for the amount collected by it in settlement of the trespass.

Judgment based on 145 Wis. 528 reversed.

The facts, which involve the rights of a homestead after entry and before patent as against trespassers, are stated in the opinion.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options


Title: Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915) in 237 U.S. 162 237 U.S. 163. Original Sources, accessed October 3, 2022, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJ54ZB2HDCM9396.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915), in 237 U.S. 162, page 237 U.S. 163. Original Sources. 3 Oct. 2022. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJ54ZB2HDCM9396.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co., 237 U.S. 162 (1915). cited in 1915, 237 U.S. 162, pp.237 U.S. 163. Original Sources, retrieved 3 October 2022, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJ54ZB2HDCM9396.