|
|
A Dictionary of American History
Contents:
Osborn v. Bank of the United States
Osborn v. Bank of the United States In 1824 the Supreme Court decided whether Ohio’s state auditor could be sued for damages stemming from his seizure, under the authority of a state law, of funds belonging to the second bank of the United States; it ruled (with one dissent) that the Eleventh Amendment did not exempt states from being sued by US officials in federal court to obtain redress for a state officer’s enforcement of an unconstitutional statute.
Contents:
Chicago:
Thomas L. Purvis, "Osborn v. Bank of the United States," A Dictionary of American History in A Dictionary of American History (Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Reference, 1995), Original Sources, accessed July 12, 2025, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJCWZAHDD7AX1UY.
MLA:
Purvis, Thomas L. "Osborn v. Bank of the United States." A Dictionary of American History, in A Dictionary of American History, Cambridge, Mass., Blackwell Reference, 1995, Original Sources. 12 Jul. 2025. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJCWZAHDD7AX1UY.
Harvard:
Purvis, TL, 'Osborn v. Bank of the United States' in A Dictionary of American History. cited in 1995, A Dictionary of American History, Blackwell Reference, Cambridge, Mass.. Original Sources, retrieved 12 July 2025, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJCWZAHDD7AX1UY.
|