Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3

Contents:
Author: Thomas Jefferson

Opinion Relative to Locating the Ten Mile Square for the Federal Government, and Building the Federal City.

March 11, 1791.

Objects which may merit the attention of the President, at Georgetown.

The commissioners to be called into action.

Deeds of cession to be taken from the land-holders.

Site of the capitol and President’s house to be determined on.

Proclamation completing the location of the territory, and fixing the site of the capitol.

Town to be laid off. Squares of reserve are to be decided on for the capitol, President’s house, offices of government, town-house, prison, market, and public walks.

Other squares for present sale designated.

Terms of sale to be settled. As there is not as yet a town legislature, and things may be done before there is one to prevent them, which yet it would be desirable to prevent, it would seem justifiable and expedient that the President should form a capitulary of such regulations as he may think necessary to be observed, until there shall be a town legislature to undertake this office; such capitulary to be indented, signed, sealed, and recorded, according to the laws of conveyance in Maryland. And to be referred to in every deed for conveyance of the lots to purchasers, so as to make a part thereof. The same thing might be effected, by inserting special covenants for every regulation in every deed; but the former method is the shortest. I cannot help again suggesting here one regulation formerly suggested, to wit: To provide for the extinguishment of fires, and the openness and convenience of the town, by prohibiting houses of excessive height. And making it unlawful to build on any one’s purchase any house with more than two floors between the common level of the earth and the eaves, nor with any other floor in the roof than one at the eaves. To consider in what way the contracts for the public buildings shall be made, and whether as many bricks should not be made this summer as may employ brick-layers in the beginning of the season of 1792, till more can be made in that season.

With respect to the amendment of the location so as to include Bladensburgh, I am of opinion it may be done with the consent of the legislature of Maryland, and that that consent may be so far counted on, as to render it expedient to declare the location at once.

The location of A B C D A having been once made, I consider as obligatory and unalterable, but by consent of parties, except so far as was necessary to render it practicable by a correction of the beginning. That correction might be lawfully made either by stopping at the river, or at the spring of Hunting creek, or by lengthening the course from the court-house so that the second course should strike the mouth of Hunting creek. I am of opinion, therefore, that the beginning at the mouth of Hunting creek, is legally justifiable. But I would advise the location E F G H E to be hazarded so as to include Bladensburgh, because it is a better location and I think will certainly be confirmed by Maryland That State will necessarily have to pass another act confirming whatever location shall be made, because her former act authorized the delegates then in office, to convey the lands. But as they were not located, no conveyance has been made, and those persons are now out of office, and dispersed. Suppose the non-concurrence of Maryland should defeat the location E F G H E, it can only be done on this principle, that the first location A B C D A was valid, and unalterable, but by mutual consent. Then their non-concurrence will re-establish the first location A B C D A, and the second location will be good for the part E I D K E without their concurrence, and this will place us where we should be were we now to complete the location E B C K E. Consequently, the experiment of an amendment proposed can lose nothing, and may gain, and probably will gain, the better location.

When I say it can lose nothing, I count as nothing, the triangle A I E, which would be in neither of the locations. Perhaps this might be taken in afterwards, either with or without the consent of Virginia.

Contents:

Related Resources

Thomas Jefferson

Download Options


Title: Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options


Title: Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: Thomas Jefferson, "Opinion Relative to Locating the Ten Mile Square for the Federal Government, and Building the Federal City.," Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3 in Thomas Jefferson, the Writings of Jefferson: Monticello Edition, Vol. 3 (Washington, D.C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904-1905), Pp.153-156 Original Sources, accessed April 25, 2024, http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJE1R7GI6CJ3TFG.

MLA: Jefferson, Thomas. "Opinion Relative to Locating the Ten Mile Square for the Federal Government, and Building the Federal City." Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3, in Thomas Jefferson, the Writings of Jefferson: Monticello Edition, Vol. 3 (Washington, D.C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904-1905), Pp.153-156, Original Sources. 25 Apr. 2024. http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJE1R7GI6CJ3TFG.

Harvard: Jefferson, T, 'Opinion Relative to Locating the Ten Mile Square for the Federal Government, and Building the Federal City.' in Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 3. cited in , Thomas Jefferson, the Writings of Jefferson: Monticello Edition, Vol. 3 (Washington, D.C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904-1905), Pp.153-156. Original Sources, retrieved 25 April 2024, from http://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=LJE1R7GI6CJ3TFG.